Bruins off-season checklist: Linus Ullmark rejects contract extension at Bruins due to…

It will be busy for the Boston Bruins. Unlike the previous offseason, when Don Sweeney’s financial shortage forced him to

It will be busy for the Boston Bruins. Unlike the previous offseason, when Don Sweeney’s financial shortage forced him to pursue cheap free agents who were hungry for success, the general manager of the Boston Bruins could spend more than $20 million. It will be necessary for him. The Bruins need to improve their left side of the defence, their centre, their flank, and their farm system.

Sweeney’s free money is but one tool for strengthening the roster. Another is a deal for a goaltender. These are the top six. Exchange with Linus Ullmark For the Bruins, moving Ullmark and his remaining year on his deal tick off a lot of boxes. Additionally, more teams will be looking to improve their goaltending in the offseason than they were at the trade deadline.

When there is more demand and more bidders enter the race, the return should be higher. Sweeney may request futures prior to the 2024 NHL Draft if he is unable to convince an NHL player to sign with Ullmark. All the Bruins have are picks in the fourth, fifth, and sixth rounds. They have to restock immediately.

If futures make up the return, the Bruins might dump all of Ullmark’s $5 million average annual worth. Sweeney may use it for Jeremy Swayman’s impending deal, among other things. Trading Ullmark also creates space for Brandon Bussi to back Swayman. Bussi will need waivers in order to be assigned to the AHL in 2024–2025.

Bussi cannot be assigned by the Bruins and then be taken for nothing by another team. It will be difficult to manage Ullmark’s partial no-trade protection. Ullmark and his agent Joakim Persson had already selected sixteen businesses when he signed his contract in 2021. The possibilities for a number of clubs may have changed since then.

Let’s take a scenario where you have a really awful team on the West Coast and they are on your (no-trade) list, Ullmark remarked. But then, perhaps three years later, they’re not at all. They could be in the running. Take a peek at Edmonton or something. Take a look at those teams that were once really awful but are now quite good. At that time, you could want to waive. But it’s not really something you can plan for ahead of time. In three or four years, how will these teams be different?

You May Also Like